Week 2 assignment
2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
Thoroughly identifies and discusses modeling
and reinforcement behaviors that are rewarded by an organization that become
repeated and permanent behavior in the workplace – examples of these concepts
relate to the scenario. Explains how the ethical climate in the scenario
precipitates how an employee will behave and believe what is acceptable
ethical behavior in the workplace.
Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full
comprehension of the subject matter. |
Identifies both modeling and reinforcement
concepts but does not give examples related to the scenario. Evaluates how
the ethical climate precipitates how employees will behave and believe what
is acceptable behavior in the workplace –but does not relate examples to the
scenario. |
Addresses either modeling or reinforcement
concepts as it pertains to the scenario but does not give examples. Discusses
ethical climates but fails to relate this concept to the scenario and does
not give examples. |
Did not address modeling or reinforcement
behaviors or give examples as these relate to the scenario. Does not evaluate how the ethical climate
of an organization can precipitate what employees believe as ethical and
acceptable behavior. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks
supporting evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |