Week 3 assignment
2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
·
Thoroughly explains the use of Tasers and finds two
relevant articles one for and one against the use of Tasers and summarizes
these by explaining the benefits and negative aspects (depending on the
position taken by the article’s author).
Identifies the ethical system (i.e., Utilitarianism, Deontology,
Virtue of ethics, Ethics of care, and egoism), in association with the use of
less lethal force technology such as the Taser and gives a relevant example.
Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension
of the subject matter. |
Explains the use of Tasers and finds two
articles but fails to summarize the articles by addressing the benefits and
negative aspects (depending on the position taken by the article’s
author). Notes the ethical concerns of
this technology and identifies an ethical system that the use of Taser
technology would apply. Does not
provide an example. |
Explains the use of Tasers finds only one
article and summarizes the article to explain the author’s position. Does not
explain the ethical concerns of the use of this technology. Identifies an
ethical system but no example is given. |
Does not identify the use of Tasers. Does not find and summarize two articles,
and does not explain the ethical concerns of the use of this technology.
Fails to identify an ethical system and no example is give. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks
supporting evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |