Week 5 assignment
1
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
·
Identifies and explains the ethical system that aligns
with why Badpenny gave Dreadford
the confidential information. Discuss two issues regarding how indigency effects a defendant’s ability to receive
effective council. Analyzes two issues concerning a conflict of interest may occur with the
defense attorney and two “Model Rules” that address the behavior of the
prosecuting attorney that are applicable in this scenario. ·
Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a
full comprehension of the subject matter. |
Identifies the ethical system but does not
explain this in correlation to the scenario, or explains the ethical system
without identifying it. Explains one issue regarding how indigency effects a defendant’s ability to receive
effective council. Analyzes on issue regarding a conflict of interest for a
defense attorney and one Model Rule for a prosecuting attorney applicable to
the scenario. |
Does not identify an ethical system nor
thoroughly explains this system and relate it to the scenario. Does not
address indigency as it relates to a defendant’s
ability to receive effective council. Analyzes either the conflict of
interest or the Model Rule but not both. |
Does
not identify the ethical system or explain this system as it relates to
the scenario. Does not explain how indigency affects a defendant’s ability to receive
effective council. Fails to analyze two possible conflict of interests that a
defense attorney may face or the two Model Rules for the prosecuting attorney
that may be applicable to the scenario. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks
supporting evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |