Week 5 assignment 1

	Exemplary	Proficient	Beginning	Inadequate
Comprehension of Assignment	· Identifies and explains the ethical system that aligns with why Badpenny gave Dreadford the confidential information. Discuss two issues regarding how indigency effects a defendant’s ability to receive effective council. Analyzes two issues concerning a conflict of interest may occur with the defense attorney and two “Model Rules” that address the behavior of the prosecuting attorney that are applicable in this scenario. · Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of the subject matter.	Identifies the ethical system but does not explain this in correlation to the scenario, or explains the ethical system without identifying it. Explains one issue regarding how indigency effects a defendant’s ability to receive effective council. Analyzes on issue regarding a conflict of interest for a defense attorney and one Model Rule for a prosecuting attorney applicable to the scenario.	Does not identify an ethical system nor thoroughly explains this system and relate it to the scenario. Does not address indigency as it relates to a defendant’s ability to receive effective council. Analyzes either the conflict of interest or the Model Rule but not both.	Does not identify the ethical system or explain this system as it relates to the scenario. Does not explain how indigency affects a defendant’s ability to receive effective council. Fails to analyze two possible conflict of interests that a defense attorney may face or the two Model Rules for the prosecuting attorney that may be applicable to the scenario.
Organization of Ideas	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment.	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment.	Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. .	No original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence.
Writing and research skills	Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient demonstration of in-text citations. The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference section.	Mechanics spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of the submission). Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent.	Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter are used.	Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks supporting evidence (no citations or reference page).
Technical application – of the assignment	The assignment met the two to three page length requirement and is double-spaced	The assignment does not meet length requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page and a half, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page length requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one full page, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement.