Week 5 assignment
2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
Thoroughly identifies the two issues where
conflict of interest may occur with judges by providing examples. Discuss the
judge’s biases and issues of objectivity as it relates to the scenario by
providing examples. Identifies one way to mitigate a judge’s unethical
behavior. Provides additional supporting evidence,
demonstrating a full comprehension of the subject matter. |
Identifies one of the conflict of interest issues
that may occur with a judge and provides an example. Discusses the judge’s
biases and issues of objectivity but fails to provide examples relating to
the scenario. Discusses one way to
mitigate a judge’s unethical behavior. |
Identifies one of the conflict of interest
issues that may occur with a judge but does not provide an example. Discusses ethical issues of biases or
objectivity as it relates to the scenario but not both and provides an
example. Discusses a judge’s unethical behavior but does not identify a way
to mitigate this behavior. |
Does not identify the conflict of interest
issues that may occur with a judge nor provides examples of these concepts as
they relate to the scenario. Fails to discuss the ethical issues of biases
and objectivity that occur with a judge nor provides examples. Does not identify a way to mitigate a
judge’s unethical behavoir. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and proper
formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly formatted
reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks supporting
evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |