Week 5 assignment 2

	Exemplary	Proficient	Beginning	Inadequate
Comprehension of Assignment	Thoroughly identifies the two issues where conflict of interest may occur with judges by providing examples. Discuss the judge’s biases and issues of objectivity as it relates to the scenario by providing examples. Identifies one way to mitigate a judge’s unethical behavior. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of the subject matter.	Identifies one of the conflict of interest issues that may occur with a judge and provides an example. Discusses the judge’s biases and issues of objectivity but fails to provide examples relating to the scenario. Discusses one way to mitigate a judge’s unethical behavior.	Identifies one of the conflict of interest issues that may occur with a judge but does not provide an example. Discusses ethical issues of biases or objectivity as it relates to the scenario but not both and provides an example. Discusses a judge’s unethical behavior but does not identify a way to mitigate this behavior.	Does not identify the conflict of interest issues that may occur with a judge nor provides examples of these concepts as they relate to the scenario. Fails to discuss the ethical issues of biases and objectivity that occur with a judge nor provides examples. Does not identify a way to mitigate a judge’s unethical behavoir.
Organization of Ideas	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment.	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment.	Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. .	No original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence.
Writing and research skills	Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient demonstration of in-text citations. The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference section.	Mechanics spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of the submission). Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent.	Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter are used.	Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks supporting evidence (no citations or reference page).
Technical application – of the assignment	The assignment met the two to three page length requirement and is double-spaced	The assignment does not meet length requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page and a half, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page length requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one full page, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement.