Week 6 assignment
2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
Thoroughly explains three of the most
relevant types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Analyzes the cloak of absolute immunity and
explains if the concept should or should not continue for prosecuting
attorneys and supports their position by providing an example as it relates
to the scenario, and supports their position with a scholarly reference. Provides additional supporting evidence,
demonstrating a full comprehension of the subject matter. |
Explains two of the three most relevant types
of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Analyzes the cloak of
absolute immunity and shares their position but does not give an example as
it relates to the scenario, and supports their position with a scholarly
reference. |
Explains one of the three most relevant types
of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Discusses their position
on whether or not the cloak of absolute immunity should or should not exist
for prosecuting attorneys but fails to support this position with a scholarly
reference. |
Does not explain any of the most relevant
types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Fails to discuss their position on whether
the cloak of absolute immunity should or should not exist for prosecuting
attorneys. Does not use scholarly
references to support their position. |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of the
overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical sequential
order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks
supporting evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length requirement,
but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one full page,
double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |