Week 6 assignment 2

	Exemplary	Proficient	Beginning	Inadequate
Comprehension of Assignment	Thoroughly explains three of the most relevant types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Analyzes the cloak of absolute immunity and explains if the concept should or should not continue for prosecuting attorneys and supports their position by providing an example as it relates to the scenario, and supports their position with a scholarly reference. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of the subject matter.	Explains two of the three most relevant types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Analyzes the cloak of absolute immunity and shares their position but does not give an example as it relates to the scenario, and supports their position with a scholarly reference.	Explains one of the three most relevant types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Discusses their position on whether or not the cloak of absolute immunity should or should not exist for prosecuting attorneys but fails to support this position with a scholarly reference.	Does not explain any of the most relevant types of prosecutorial misconduct as noted in the textbook. Fails to discuss their position on whether the cloak of absolute immunity should or should not exist for prosecuting attorneys. Does not use scholarly references to support their position.
Organization of Ideas	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment.	Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment.	Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. .	No original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence.
Writing and research skills	Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient demonstration of in-text citations. The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference section.	Mechanics spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of the submission). Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent.	Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter are used.	Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks supporting evidence (no citations or reference page).
Technical application – of the assignment	The assignment met the two to three page length requirement and is double-spaced	The assignment does not meet length requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page and a half, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page length requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one full page, double-spaced.	The assignment does not meet the page requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement.