Week 7 assignment
2
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
Comprehension of Assignment |
Identified the ethical system that explains
Ponzi’s actions in the scenario by providing an example as it relates to the
scenario. Discusses two possible consequences of Ponzi’s action if he were to
be caught signing off on Daniels attendance sheet noted in the textbook. Thoroughly explains the five responses to
corruption an organization can implement to reduce unethical behaviors noted
in the textbook. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a
full comprehension of the subject matter. |
Identified the ethical system that explains
Ponzi’s actions in the scenario by providing an example as it relates to the
scenario. Discusses one of the two possible consequences of Ponzi’s action if
he were to be caught signing off on Daniels attendance sheet noted in the
textbook. Explains three of the five
responses to corruption an organization can implement to reduce unethical
behaviors noted in the textbook. |
Identifies the ethical system that explains
Ponzi’s actions, but does not provide an example as it relates to the
scenario. Does not discuss the possible consequences of Ponzi’s actions. Explains two of the five responses to
corruption an organization can implement to reduce unethical behaviors noted
in the textbook. |
Fails to identify the ethical system that
explains Ponzi’s actions, and does not provide an example as it relates to
the scenario. Does not discuss the possible consequences of Ponzi’s action
and fails to explain any of the five responses to corruption an organization
can implement to reduce unethical behaviors noted in the textbook |
Organization of Ideas |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. |
Original ideas are effectively developed and
presented in a logical, sequential order within 70% of the assignment. |
Original ideas are minimal less than 25% of
the overall assignment. The organization is not presented in a logical
sequential order making it difficult to understand the writer. . |
No original ideas or organization present
throughout the entire assignment. The paper lacks no supporting evidence. |
Writing and research skills |
Mechanics
(spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are without error, including proficient
demonstration of in-text citations.
The in-text citations are accurately captured in the reference
section. |
Mechanics
spelling, grammar, and punctuation are minimal (Errors do not exceed 30% of
the submission).
Writer demonstrates an understanding of the use of in-text citations and
proper formation. Writer demonstrates the understanding of a properly
formatted reference page (errors are minimal) Example, Does not double space or indent. |
Errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and
punctuation) exceed 70% of the overall submission. Does not demonstrate the
use of in-text citations and proper formatting. Minimal use of resources
relevant to the subject matter are used. |
Assignment is incomprehensible due to
multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Lacks supporting
evidence (no citations or reference page). |
Technical application – of the assignment |
The assignment met the two to three page
length requirement and is double-spaced |
The assignment does not meet length
requirement but it at least 75% of the minimum requirement example, one page
and a half, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page length
requirement, but does meet 50% of the page length requirement. Example, one
full page, double-spaced. |
The assignment does not meet the page
requirement and is less than 50% of the page length requirement. |