Week 7 Team Project Assessment Rubric: “Retention and Motivation Action Plan”
Criteria |
Non-performance 0 – 11 points |
Needs Work 12 – 13 points |
Developing 14 – 15 points |
Proficient 16 – 17 points |
Exemplary 18 – 20 points |
Identification and analysis of how organizational structure and job design will impact this plan overall. 20% |
Non-understanding on the identification and analysis of how organizational structure and job design will impact the plan |
Attempts to identify and analyze how organizational structure and job design will impact the plan overall but is unclear, difficult to follow, and unsupported by examples |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational structure and job design will impact the plan. Uses unknown or not well-established sources to support arguments. |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational structure and design will impact the plan on a high-level overview and uses acceptable sources to support arguments. |
Effectively identifies and analyzes how organizational structure and job design will impact the plan. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Identification and analysis of any ethical implications and social responsibility that may influence this plan overall
20% |
Non-understanding on the identification and analysis of ethical implications and social responsibility that may influence the plan. |
Does not clearly identify and analyze ethical implications and social responsibility. Answers given are unsupported by examples |
Identifies and analyzes ethical implications and social responsibility that may influence the plan. Uses unknown or not well-established sources to support arguments. |
Identifies and analyzes ethical implications and social responsibility on a high-level overview and uses acceptable sources to support arguments. |
Effectively identifies and analyzes ethical implications and social responsibility that may influence the overall plan. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Identification and analysis of how organizational culture will affect this plan overall. Compare and contrast your organization’s culture with the culture of another company in the same industry. 20% |
Non-Understanding on the identification and analysis of how organizational culture will impact the plan. Does not compare and contrast organization’s culture with the culture of another company in the same industry. |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational culture will impact the action plan overall but the analysis is unclear, unsupported by examples, and difficult to follow throughout the presentation. Comparison and contrast of the organizational culture with not complete. |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational culture will impact the plan and provides a comparison and contrast of the current organizational culture with another company’s culture in the same industry. Uses unknown sources or not reflective of the topic. |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational culture will impact the action plan overall. Compares and contrast organizational current culture with another company’s culture in the same industry. Includes acceptable supporting evidence |
Identifies and analyzes how organizational culture will impact the action plan overall. Includes a comparison and contrast of the current organizational culture. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Determine if your company’s team leadership is the problem for low retention and motivation
20% |
Does not determine whether company’s leadership might be the problem for low motivation and retention |
Inconsistent and unclear in determining leadership issues and the impact on motivation and retention. Answers given are unclear or unsupported by examples
|
Determines if the leadership may be the problem for company’s low motivation and retention. Uses unknown sources or not reflective of the topic. |
Determines whether leadership team is the problem for low motivation and retention. Includes acceptable supporting evidence |
Effectively determines if the leadership is the problem for company’s low motivation and retention. Provides additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter.
|
Writing and Research Skills 20% |
PowerPoint presentation has no logical flow and is difficult to understand due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. No evidence of resources used in the PowerPoint presentation
|
Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inconsistent use of citations and formatting. Notes section was minimally used to further expand on concepts
Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Uses appropriate mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) with inconsistent use of citations and formatting. Uses notes section to further explain concepts and theories.
Uses unknown or not well-established sources to support arguments. |
Demonstrates effective writing skills using appropriate mechanics (grammar, spelling, and punctuations) citations, and formatting in the majority of the PowerPoint presentation. Uses the notes section to further explain and discuss the concepts and the main points.
Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Excellent and consistent use of mechanics (grammar, spelling, and punctuation) including proficient use of citations and formatting throughout the entire PowerPoint presentation. Uses the notes section to accurately explain and discuss the main points.
Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall PowerPoint presentation. |